<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Log on JavaScript &#187; ie6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jslog.com/tag/ie6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jslog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What I expect from ExtJS 4</title>
		<link>http://www.jslog.com/what-i-expect-from-extjs-4</link>
		<comments>http://www.jslog.com/what-i-expect-from-extjs-4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>radu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ExtJS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extjs4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raphael]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jslog.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, as many of you know, the guys from Sencha are already working on ExtJS 4, and will be showing an preview at the Sencha Conference in San Francisco. As I won&#8217;t attend (there&#8217;s quite a distance from Cluj-Napoca, Romania to San Francisco), I am expressing here some opinions on what I think would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as many of you know, the guys from Sencha are already working on ExtJS 4, and will be showing an preview at the Sencha Conference in San Francisco. As I won&#8217;t attend (there&#8217;s quite a distance from <a href="http://maps.google.ro/?ie=UTF8&amp;hq=&amp;hnear=Cluj-Napoca,+Cluj&amp;ll=46.800059,23.598633&amp;spn=8.153282,19.753418&amp;z=6" target="_blank">Cluj-Napoca, Romania</a> to San Francisco), I am expressing here some opinions on what I think would be nice to have in the upcoming ExtJS version. All these are gathered in one full year of experience and heavy development with ExtJS, and previous years of experience with JavaScript and some jQuery.</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Keep the DOM small</strong>. I know all the DOM elements in ExtJS have a reason and they are needed in order to have nicely rounded corners in all browsers and consistent behavior. Yet it&#8217;s quite too much, especially for large applications. I am currently developing a large web 2.0 application with ExtJS and on older browsers the performance is a big issue (you should read IE 7 and 8). The application behaves well with Firefox 3.5+ and runs the smoothest with Chrome. But when having more than just 2,3 windows and a simple grid, when you have live events and Comet notifications, stores sharing data and large UI controls, you have to start thinking on how to keep everything running smoothly. The next points touch on keeping the DOM small as well.</li>
<li><strong>Drop IE 6 support</strong>. We all hate it. Google dropped it and so should the team at Sencha. All the DOM elements are needed for old browsers like IE 6. But we could drop support for it and have a smaller DOM, so better performance and happier users. Those who still need IE 6 can continue on the 3.x ExtJS branch. Come on, we now have HTML5 and CSS3. I know the adoption is not the best, but hey, we are web developers, let&#8217;s push at least for a minimum subset of it to be out there.</li>
<li><strong>Integrate </strong><a href="http://raphaeljs.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Raphael</strong></a><strong> graphs</strong>. It was nice to see Sencha being formed and acquiring Raphael and jqTouch. We now saw jqTouch contributing to Sencha Touch. The next normal step I think is to integrate Raphael graphs into ExtJS. I really suppose this is the intention, but let&#8217;s mention it upfront, just in case. It&#8217;s nice to have charting, but Flash is not the best sollution.</li>
<li><strong>Give us an integrated test platform</strong>. Testing is important, but we don&#8217;t see it so often in our own ExtJS apps. Yes, <a href="http://www.jslog.com/testing-extjs-with-selenium-automating-ui-tests" target="_blank">we test with Selenium</a>, and this is a great tool, but show us the testing framework in ExtJS. As far as I know, the Sencha team is using a customized <a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/3/test/" target="_blank">YUI Test</a> framework. Would be nice if they shared it, so we can all benefit.</li>
<li><strong>Custom theming</strong>. This is a well known issue, but let&#8217;s just recap we need this. ExtJS would benefit from a much larger adoption if they had an easy way to build themes, like the <a href="http://jqueryui.com/themeroller/" target="_blank">jQueryUI theme roller</a>. Let&#8217;s face it, on this issue, jQuery is far more attractive. I didn&#8217;t like to say it, but that&#8217;s the truth. With the help of a designer I have put up a custom theme, and yes&#8230;. you have a bit of headache. It&#8217;s not like you&#8217;re building it in one day, if you want something a bit more complicated and flashy. It was nice to see SASS being used in Sencha Touch. This is a first step towards easy, custom theming.</li>
<li><strong>Distribution builder</strong>. ExtJS is very nice, but sometimes you just need a bit of it. You just want a window and a grid, so importing the whole library is quite expensive. I know this was present with the ExtJS 2 distribution, and let&#8217;s hope we&#8217;ll have it back again. A workaround on this would be using the Google Closure JavaScript Compiler to have the unused code removed from our apps. Then we would still have problems with the &#8216;<strong>xtype</strong>&#8216; config, and would probably need to artificially instantiate all the components which have their xtype used in the application. Anyway, this is just an idea to try out, but it would be nice to have something from the official distribution.</li>
</ol>
<p>These are not all the issues that would be nice to have, but at least the most important that come to mind. It&#8217;s nice to see the ExtJS ecosystem at work and new components popping up, like the pivot grid, the calendar etc.</p>
<p>So&#8230; looking forward to ExtJS version 4 and hoping to see that many (why not all?) of these issues find their way into the framework. Looking forward to see the great work! Keep up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jslog.com/what-i-expect-from-extjs-4/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google won&#8217;t support IE6</title>
		<link>http://www.jslog.com/google-wont-support-ie6</link>
		<comments>http://www.jslog.com/google-wont-support-ie6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>radu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jslog.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a good news for all web developers. As I am using Google Apps, I have just received an email from Google stating that they will not support IE6 any longer in their apps. Well&#8230; finally a big player had the courage to make IE6 history! To give you a bit more detail about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good news for all web developers. As I am using Google Apps, I have just received an email from <strong>Google</strong> stating that they <strong>will not support IE6</strong> any longer in their apps. Well&#8230; finally a big player had the courage to make IE6 history! To give you a bit more detail about what Google is going to do, here is a quote from their email:</p>
<blockquote><p>Over the course of 2010, we will be phasing out support for Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 as well as other older browsers that are not supported by their own manufacturers.</p>
<p>We plan to begin phasing out support of these older browsers on the Google Docs suite and the Google Sites editor on March 1, 2010.  After that point, certain functionality within these applications may have higher latency and may not work correctly in these older browsers. Later in 2010, we will start to phase out support for these browsers for Google Mail and Google Calendar.</p>
<p>Google Apps will continue to support Internet Explorer 7.0 and above, Firefox 3.0 and above, Google Chrome 4.0 and above, and Safari 3.0 and above.</p></blockquote>
<p>We will certainly not miss you, IE6!<br />
Waiting for comments from happy developers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jslog.com/google-wont-support-ie6/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

