Comments on: Google Closure Advanced Compilation http://www.jslog.com/google-closure-advanced-compilation Fri, 15 Jul 2011 04:51:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: G.L.Srinivasan http://www.jslog.com/google-closure-advanced-compilation/comment-page-1#comment-85 G.L.Srinivasan Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:10:31 +0000 http://www.jslog.com/?p=171#comment-85 Hello, I am wondering the JavaScript obfuscation done by the Closure compiler and the Gpoogt Web Toolkit Java-JavaScript compiler. The GWT compiler can obfuscat ehte code. I would like to know in what way the GWT compiler is different from the Closure? Can I just give Javasciript code only ot the GWT compiler and get it JS Obfuscted? In the Avanced Optiomization case, we can list all the class names, method names and global variables that should not be substituted by the compiler along with Javascript reserved words. The local variables and local method names can be substituted. One has to make sure that these mehto names are not imported into other .js files suing "...src=" xyx.js"... for example. The html consutrctions like "" the id and class values whcih are string literals should not be substituted if we include .css and .jsp files. Any input and use of GWT compiler will be apprecaited! Thanks GL Hello,
I am wondering the JavaScript obfuscation done by the Closure compiler and the Gpoogt Web Toolkit Java-JavaScript compiler. The GWT compiler can obfuscat ehte code. I would like to know in what way the GWT compiler is different
from the Closure?
Can I just give Javasciript code only ot the GWT compiler and get it JS Obfuscted?

In the Avanced Optiomization case,
we can list all the class names, method names and global variables that should not be substituted by the compiler
along with Javascript reserved words.
The local variables and local method names can be substituted. One has to make sure that these mehto names are not imported into other .js files suing “…src=” xyx.js”… for example.
The html consutrctions like “” the id and class values whcih are string literals should not be substituted if we include .css and .jsp files.

Any input and use of GWT compiler will be apprecaited!

Thanks
GL

]]> By: a little madness » Blog Archive » JavaScript Compressor Comparison http://www.jslog.com/google-closure-advanced-compilation/comment-page-1#comment-54 a little madness » Blog Archive » JavaScript Compressor Comparison Thu, 03 Jun 2010 07:14:01 +0000 http://www.jslog.com/?p=171#comment-54 [...] The simple compilation option was used with Google Closure as this is typically the one that will be used. For a discussion on why, check out the excellent post on A Log of Javascript. [...] [...] The simple compilation option was used with Google Closure as this is typically the one that will be used. For a discussion on why, check out the excellent post on A Log of Javascript. [...]

]]>